Hero Text

1972 – 50 years of service to the commercial industrial retail real estate industry – 2022.


July 25, 2013

SB 673 (DeSaulnier; D-Concord) – a bill that would erode local governments’ ability to make land use decisions and move forward with infrastructure and development projects that receive over $1 million in subsidies without a state-mandated economic impact report – passed the Senate Local Government Committee on a party line 4-2 vote.

Please note, that this bill would impact all types of development – this is NOT just aimed at “Superstores” or “Retail” projects. New office building on a Brownfield? Industrial building in an area that just had water-runoff work? Yes, these could be considered “subsidies” under the current broad definitions of the bill.

We believe that local governments are able to make decisions regarding such projects in a well-informed manner. Under current law, local governments can seek advice from a broad range of other government agencies and consultants, and regularly require cost-benefit analysis of projects.

The “analysis” required by SB 673 is already required and/or can be required by the local government approving the project. This measure is seen as a way to create an unnecessary hurdle in order to slow certain projects and we are opposing this bill. The bill will next be considered by the Senate Appropriations committee.

Posted In Uncategorized

Leave a reply